worth saying it the other direction too. "not clearly authorised as a food" isnt the same as "poison in a jar" — people jump straight from hype to pan...

no. not doing that one here, not even as a joke. declare it, take whatever answer you get, walk off. its a jar of honey, its not worth your name attac...

also worth saying out loud — "this one isnt for me" is a completely fine place to end up. it gets framed as missing out but nobodys owed a jar of anyt...

stick to broad categories and youre fine. pregnancy or breastfeeding, anyone with heart or blood pressure things going on, anyone on regular medicatio...

@Sam's scoreboard thing is basically the whole difference. file it under high and more reads as better. file it under a plant compound your heart and ...

pretty much, and the reason nobody here will toss out a rough number is what it gets used for. people dont ask this out of idle curiosity, they ask be...

totally fair to say it might not be for you and leave it there. theres no badge for trying it. on the fence and a bit anxious? "not right now" is a co...

the having-a-plan part matters more than people think. deciding ahead that getting help is allowed takes most of the fear out

flagging the obvious next question before it lands: "so is one a swap for the other". no, and im not going there. different things, different profiles...

its anti-hype both directions, thats the bit people miss. we push back just as hard on the "this is dangerous poison" panic as on the miracle stuff. g...

Exactly. 'Not for you' is a valid outcome.

the framing is just "its food". you're not hiding anything. if anyone asks, its honey, done. no reason to act cagey, that only turns a non-event into ...

yeah it front-loads the worst behaviour. "how strong can i make this" instead of a small amount and some respect