And it primes intensity chasing: 'if it's like weed, I'll treat it like weed.' Bad idea.

But comparisons can create 'replace X with Y' thinking. Not our goal.

And that category-mapping is where people start doing 'replace X with Y' thinking. We don’t do that here; different product, different risks.

Totally fair. The safe move is to treat variability as a reason for caution, not a reason to chase intensity.

Exactly. Its not about fearmongering. Its about stacking uncertainty: alcohol effects + individual differences + batch variability = higher risk.

Yes. Safety-first includes opting out.

Reminder: no step-by-step instructions. Keep it general and safety-first.

Im with @Sam on slope risk, but I’m not for censorship. We can keep it safe by enforcing a template:'I used it as part of my wind-down' 'No guar...

Drop intensity chasing. Those communities sometimes normalize 'push it until you feel it.' That mindset doesn’t belong here. Different category, diffe...

And people ignore the safety takeaway: dont treat it like a stunt and dont assume its for everyone.

Honestly? If your gut says 'not for me,' thats a valid decision. Safety-first includes opting out. No product is worth overriding your own boundaries.

Sorry that happened. The internet rewards extremes. Our approach is boundaries + risk education, not hype.