the 'basically a legal high' framing is doing real damage
every viral post frames this as a loophole drug. "the legal high nobody's talking about". and i get why it spreads but the framing itself changes who shows up and how they treat it. you call something a legal high and you've basically told people to go chase a ceiling. thats the exact wrong mindset for this
the thumbnails are always some guy with his eyes rolling back. cant imagine why people then turn up expecting that
yeah it front-loads the worst behaviour. "how strong can i make this" instead of a small amount and some respect
"drug" is lazy as a category too. lumping it in with recreational stuff smuggles in a whole set of expectations that dont fit
and the framing isnt an accident. "legal high" = clickbait that also moves jars. fear and hype run on the same engine
-
the 'it only works once, then never again' claim, anyone actually looked into this3 days ago
-
Does the smell actually tell you anything? Someone claimed they can smell how strong a jar is1 week ago
-
does it really only grow in nepal and turkey, is that even true2 weeks ago
-
Does organic certification actually mean anything for this specific honey3 weeks ago
-
the 'you need more each time' idea, is that actually a real thing or internet lore3 weeks ago
- 10 Forums
- 208 Topics
- 1,450 Posts
- 0 Online
- 30 Members