When people avoid risk talk, it feels like PR. That’s why skeptics don’t trust the culture angle sometimes.

This is where marketing gets shady. Same name, different reality, and people assume it’s identical.

They’re writing it for impulse buyers. “Banned” makes it feel like you’re getting away with something.

Not inevitable. Standards + transparency can protect communities. It’s work, but possible.

So like… I wasn’t crazy for thinking it’s meaningless?

Ok but where are these standards publicly? I just see brands posting pretty mountains.

Yeah i agree with @rae and avoiding the topic makes it feel like censorship.

So the narrative shift is basically: stop selling it like a dare?

Ok ok ok, but real question: if it’s cultural then why is the main content online just people acting messed up?

This is the first place I’ve seen anyone talk about it like food culture instead of “legal drug.” Huge difference.

I think the missing piece is: not every conversation has to be pro/anti. It can be “interesting + needs standards.”

I admit I only knew it from “crazy honey trip” videos. Hearing this makes me rethink how I even talk about it.

My myth: “It’s identical to psychedelics.” People say that casually and it makes me doubt everything else they claim.