Notifications
Clear all

if potency isnt standardised jar to jar, what is general caution advice even based on

9 Posts
8 Users
0 Reactions
118 Views
Posts: 58
Topic starter
(@jules)
Trusted Member
Joined: 6 months ago
[#220]

ok so if grayanotoxin content isnt standardised jar to jar, what is the general caution advice even anchored to. it can't be an amount, none of us knows what's in ours. genuinely asking.


8 Replies
Posts: 71
 Ben
(@ben)
Trusted Member
Joined: 5 months ago

Its anchored to the not knowing. you cant get a number for your own jar without lab data most people dont have access to, so caution is where you end up by default.


Reply
Avatar photo
Posts: 143
 Sam
(@sam)
Estimable Member
Joined: 10 months ago

eh. the jar in my cupboard says standardised strength on it, which means nothing lol. but 'we can't know so we wont say' is convenient for a forum too.


Reply
Posts: 26
 Joe
(@joe)
Eminent Member
Joined: 8 months ago

@Sam ha. two jars here, identical labels, and neither of them had a batch code on it. asked which batch was which and got a very friendly reply that said nothing. well, not nothing, it said same harvest.


Reply
Avatar photo
Posts: 76
 Lena
(@lena)
Trusted Member
Joined: 1 year ago

Joe's example is the actual problem. What would help is a result tied to one specific lot, with that lot printed on the jar itself. If nothing is printed, there's nothing for a document to point at. That doesnt change the caution, only what anyone can claim to know.


Reply
Page 1 / 2
Share:
Scroll to Top