are we loving the cliffs to death
the year round demand thread got me thinking about the other side of it. if the west suddenly wants endless mad honey, and sellers promise endless supply, somethings got to give. apis laboriosa colonies are already under pressure and overharvesting the same cliffs hits the bees and next seasons honey both. are we just hyping this into the ground
this is part of why the intensity-chasing bothers me. treated as a wellness ritual, people use a little occasionally. sold as an extreme thrill, the demand balloons and the cliffs pay for it
traditionally the hunts are limited, twice a year, and the communities know not to strip a cliff bare because they need it again. the danger is outside buyers pushing for more than the cliff can give, and using money to undercut that restraint. sustainable here means respecting the rhythm the hunters already keep, not inventing a third harvest to fill a spreadsheet
realistically demand isnt going away, so the lever is buying from sources tied to the communities that have to live with those cliffs next year. they have the strongest reason not to wreck it. a random reseller chasing volume has none
-
the 'mystical tribesmen' angle needs to stop2 months ago
-
Mad Honey Harvest Ethics: Should Buyers Demand Proof of Fair Pay?3 months ago
-
Climate and harvest shifts — what's actually changing?4 months ago
-
Nepal Honey Hunters: What Outsiders Get Wrong About the Cliff Harvest Videos5 months ago
-
Is everything about mad honey cultural appreciation or cultural extraction?7 months ago
- 10 Forums
- 156 Topics
- 1,137 Posts
- 1 Online
- 30 Members